In almost all forums the advice is to go for SSD and add an external drive. If you’re getting a MacBook Air, for instance, you can choose from the 128GB and 256GB versions. In most of the situations where I've observed failure, it's been a firmware problem that has affected both members of a mirror so RAID would not have mattered. The actual Fusion ioMemory test suite was run on a pre-production 6.4TB¹ Ultrastar DC SN200 add-in-card (running firmware version 0.4), and its If you need the best performance, you should go with a dedicated SSD. 1TB and 3TB fusion drive in iMacs. We suppose these are enough for performance-oriented tasks. Random writes, async: Since Fusion-IO could build the SSD unit to match the IO capability of a PCI-E slot, it is natural to interface directly to PCI-E. All the major server system vendors (Dell, HP, IBM) OEM the Fusion-IO cards. This SSD costs nearly $18,000 and loses out to just about every NVMe SSD out there. But, at least, you’re paying only a fraction of dedicated Flash storage. A detailed look at the performance of four Intel X25-M SSDs in RAID 0 versus the 160GB Fusion-io ioDrive. Apple Fusion Drive Vs Flash Storage – In-Practice Scenario. Fusion-io ioDrive2 Firmware v6.0.0, rev 107004 Public, Fusion-io driver version: 3.1.1. Get the best deals on Fusion-io Solid State Drives and find everything you'll need to improve your home office setup at eBay.com. The name is used in devices made by Apple Inc. We should at least be very close to the 4GB/s barrier, which the PCIe 2.0 x8 provides. We are going to do some work in that direction. In March 2009, Hewlett-Packard announced the HP StorageWorks IO Accelerator adaptation of Fusion-io technology specifically for HP BladeSystem C-Series servers. Pat, I’m the least expert of anyone commenting here, but it’s my opinion that a database truly designed for SSD simply doesn’t exist. SATA vs. M.2 SSD – SATA is a bus type and M.2 is a form factor. Fusion-io's SSDs are unique in today's enterprise flash accelerator market in that they don't include a microprocessor on-board the SSD card to implement the main functions of the SSD controller. Now simple dividing TPM on price of IO system, we have RAID 10 - 4.8 TPM / $ SSD - 27 TPM / $ FusionIO … It just seems to me that inherently using a PCIe attached solution is going to be better than pushing ssd's behind fc or sas connections based on the bandwidth. Reply Delete. ... You could try it and you might just come out fine with it, but I simply cannot tolerate 2+weeks of time to get a single card replaced. Resolution 2560x1440. Since Fusion-IO could build the SSD unit to match the IO capability of a PCI-E slot, it is natural to interface directly to PCI-E. All the major server system vendors (Dell, HP, IBM) OEM the Fusion-IO cards. Your email address will not be published. the question is for the next generation of hardware (probably no earlier than June 2019). Vadim leads Percona Labs, which focuses on technology research and performance evaluations of Percona’s and third-party products. While choosing the external drive, you can even go for a noiseless, high-speed and USB 3.0 HDD. Who would run a database without durability? TIn this setup, there is no ‘hacking’ required to properly cluster your Windows server, but this is one expensive setup. What I can’t help wonder is if a lot of the “tricks” that a modern database like innodb uses might actually be counterproductive on a device with fairly uniform access times like an SSD. Below is the original Fusion-IO ioDrive card with a PCI-E gen 1 x4 upstream interface. I never use a mac. Hi! Please note that price of transaction is not the main criteria to consider, as total TCO for systems with SSD may be much cheaper (considering you need less servers, less space, less power). If we take the case of iMac, the maximum Flash storage you can get is 1TB. Fusion-io's ioXtreme and ioXtreme Pro cards just showed up to the Boston HH Test Labs and as we like to say around here, they're looking pretty . It’s better to run innodb flush tx at log commit=2 rather than have the disk subsystem do this. But this is status quo: software historically lags hardware, by and large. I have had a loan card from Fusion and estimate it speeds up our ERP system by 20% which is good. Also worth to consider that SSD is only 32GB space and to have the same space as FusionIO we need 4 cards (but it still will be cheaper than FusionIO), but it also may improve performance as such setup will be able to handle IO requests in parallel. It’s been a long time since the last blog post on SSD benchmarking – I’ve been busy! For SSD I can get 32GB card for 390$, which is ~12.1$ per GB For FusionIO I really not sure what is price (it was given as only for tests), but quick googling gave me 30$ per GB, so for 160GB card gives 4800$. This review features the 3.2TB edition of the SX300. The card comes in only one size, 420GB. Want to get weekly updates listing the latest blog posts? – Components won’t wear out as much over time — no “defragging” and such necessary. Use Percona's Technical Forum to ask any follow-up questions on this blog topic. Fusion-IO focuses on enterprise flash products (both hardware and software) and is probably one of the most iconic enterprise SSD companies because … By comparison, Fusion-io's ioDrive2, which is an in-server flash card, uses eight lanes to its MLC flash chips, offering greater throughput. With the PCIE card we already reach the ~10% flash ratio but for the same price I was wondering what the best choice woulds be? And, yes, SSDs work awesome with Apple devices. The speed at which they read and write information is almost entirely contingent on how they are arranged and how the controllers that pick up and send the data coordinate the process.Theoretically, you could end up with an SD card that writes and reads just as fa… In documentation I saw you can trade “space” for performance, that’s you say – that only 120GB (or even less) space available, and other 40GB allocated for FusionIO internal needs. Yes, it’s nice to have “everything on one drive” and put your trust in Apple’s software to manage what goes where, however I’ve found very few reasons to go with a Fusion Drive these days — they’re very much the “holdover” component as the industry transitions to all flash based memory. That is, let’s take Flash Drive first. $250.00. FusionIO supports said that it was broken card and I got replacement. Any notes on reliability, performance over long runs, and Other impact on the servers. Coming to the disadvantages section, we have a few here, too. SSD, solid-state drive) ... 2007 рік — компанія Fusion-io анонсувала карту SSD, що підключається через PCIe, з 100,000 операціями вводу/виводу за секунду (IOPS), і з ємністю до 320 гігабайт. From my first hand experience with the iodrive; they are not ready for prime time. It is like 4 against 1. Subscribe now and we'll send you an update every Friday at 1pm ET. Mac vs PC: Which is Better – OS X or Windows », List of Alternative Operating Systems for Windows », Computer Facts and Interesting Facts About Technology ». Hopefully others can chime in with experiences. While configuring an iMac, you have the option to shift between SSD or Fusion Drive. or Best Offer. F11-003-410G-CS-0001 SANDISK FUSION IOSCALE 410GB PCI-E SSD Solid State Drive. Enterprise solid-state-drive maker Fusion-io has now announced that it plans to tap into the same market with a super-fast SSD. If you need high-end performance and unparalleled speed, we do recommend going with dedicated Flash Storage. Hans, do yourself a favor and get the SSD/Flash Memory, even if you have to do the 256GB option to save some $. Server-side flash star Fusion-io (s fio) got an impressive chunk of the revenue in the enterprise SSD category last year, with 13.6 percent, second only to Intel, (s intc) which got 18.1 percent. As I understood by default FusionIO is not in “reliable” mode, that’s you may lose your few last writes in case of power outage. In that case, the macOS system will move the application into SSD storage. So, that’s how we deal with Fusion Drive Vs Flash Drive war. I will go for the top end spec but would like to know more about the benefits of an SSD over a 2tb 128gb flash fusion drive. There is no way I would pay even half of that for this kind of performance. Quote The ioMemory SX300 offers 1.25, 1.6 … If I already store all videos and music on an external drive, why do I need a flash larger than 128gb? Fusion-io ioDrive 160GB EA00192-000 Internal PCIe SSD Solid State Drive . And, we can start with an introduction to both. Filesystem – XFS mounted with nobarrier option. In June 2012, the Btrfs principal developers Chris Mason joined Fusion-io after leaving Oracle, and Josef Bacik left Red Hat to join Fusion-io. Out of the whole storage, the SSD part will be used for storing frequently accessed files. Frankly I doubt you need the kind of performance a Fusion IO card will provide (200K IOPS, 500 microsecond latency) You'd probably get all the performance you need from 4 Intel DC S3700 SATA SSDs (about 20K IOPS each at 1ms latency) and spend 1/2 as much. The ioDrive, by Fusion-io, was released in early 2009 and is still one of the fastest flash-based storage solutions you can get. Now to the results. You can lose some transactions but at least when you restart you don’t have data corruption. Fusion-io Friday announced what it is calling the fastest server-based solid state drive on the market today, with double the slot capacity if its older PCI Express-based ioDrive. Input/output operations per second (IOPS, pronounced eye-ops) is an input/output performance measurement used to characterize computer storage devices like hard disk drives (HDD), solid state drives (SSD), and storage area networks (SAN). The memory chips are directly on an x4 PCIe card and therefore, unlike SSDs, do not have SATA, or SAS connections. With FusionIO as I understand there are 320G cards and you should be able to put couple of them in the same 2U chassis getting comparable storage. I think you are right. Your email address will not be published. So, summing up, Fusion Drives provide better speed and performance than HDDs, but not on par with dedicated Storage. I.e. Percona Labs designs no-gimmick tests of hardware, filesystems, storage engines, and databases that surpass the standard performance and functionality scenario benchmarks.Vadim’s expertise in LAMP performance and multi-threaded programming help optimize MySQL and InnoDB internals to take full advantage of modern hardware. As we said, it combines SSD and HDD Storage components, to form a single memory device. Good stuff! You’re right – it can be very interesting thing to tune Innodb for SSD devices. This SSD costs nearly $18,000 and loses out to just about every NVMe SSD out there. I got hold of one that had been sat around for some time. I did a comparison of my Samsung M.2 and this Fusion IO card. I am about to buy a new 27 iMac for video editing and music production. You maybe under NDA and cannot answer which is fine, but I have heard that Fusion has certain interesting characteristics under certain load. Fusion IO vs. OCZ Z-Drive R2 ... IODrive is just 1 SSD. We should at least be very close to the 4GB/s barrier, which the PCIe 2.0 x8 provides. In 2020 that’s unacceptable. It may not be available in higher capacities. iMac is an all-in-one computer series from Apple Inc, which is regularly updated with high-end specs and processors. I wouldn’t be surprised if Fusion-io spent $50k on this document, so they want it to tell the right story, and tell it fast. But for the same price we can have a 400GB Fusion-IO or a 1,6TB SSD. A detailed look at the performance of four Intel X25-M SSDs in RAID 0 versus the 160GB Fusion-io ioDrive. You don’t have many customization options while purchasing a Mac device, except in the case of storage. Doesn’t XtraDB have an option to disable flushing of all dirty pages in an extent when one of them has an LSN that is too old? $85.00. All Rights Reserved. The benefit at the time was the low cost of HP-branded Fusion-io cards, the ability to software RAID via ZFS and the performance capabilities of the PCIe bus versus the limits of the SAS bus and low RAID controller IOPS. The logic here is simple. Fusion Drive is basically a hybrid hard drive. What do we need filesystems for? ... Fusion-io ioFX Accelerator solid state drive 410 GB - PCI Express 2.0 x4. But for the same price we can have a 400GB Fusion-IO or a 1,6TB SSD. Filed under: Storage — Tags: flash, fusionio, ssd — Nate @ 4:51 pm . Below is the original Fusion-IO ioDrive card with a PCI-E gen 1 x4 upstream interface. Either way, you can deal with the issue of the lack of storage space. RAID5 from 8 64G drives will give you 448G of space in standard 2U chassis. Like benchmarks, IOPS numbers published by storage device manufacturers do not directly relate to real-world application performance. Another viable solution is this. However, you have better choices when coming to iMac. It would be very interesting to see how raw IO, filesystems as well as MySQL scale with multiple Intel SSD drives of FusionIO cards. For all other devices, you need to choose between SSD or HDD. So, in short, your Flash-based iMac would be having one Solid State Drive for all storage purposes. Fusion-io positions ioScale for new SSD Dynasties Editor:- January 16, 2013 - Fusion-io has released a new PCIe SSD called the ioScale (3.2TB on a single half length PCIe slot) which is aimed at technically savvy customers who have the potential to use thousands of cards in their installations in new dynasty enterprise SSD apps. Percona's experts can maximize your application performance with our open source database support, managed services or consulting. So, decide your requirements first. if the buyer has the budget – SSD is better Also, the requirement to buy HP Enterprise SSDs was … After installing the cards, make sure that the ESXi host can recognize them. If you go with 2TB, however, there is an increase to 128GB Flash Storage. Seems like some folks are on to this SSD optimisation already. And, understand this thing before you continue: you can’t really compare SSDs and Flash Drives. In fact, SSDs are now using Flash Storage interface, for better performance and speed. Replacing a drive in the new iMacs is a serious pain in the butt – get more reliable components now to save yourself in 3-6 years. In the market, you can even find external SSDs with better speed and relatively higher prices. ": July 2014 - SanDisk completed the acquisition of Fusion-io. Buying a mac or any other device depends on your requirements. – Fusion Drive has far higher failure rates – if one part of the drive gets corrupted or fails, you lose all data. Free shipping. It also (but I didn’t measure) reduces the amount of system memory required to use the SSDs. 对比Intel和Fusion-IO的SSD卡，我们可以发现，其体系架构一定是不一样的，Intel的思路和LSI等公司研发的SSD卡是一样的。采用的是PCI桥+SAS控制器的硬件架构方式，但是，Fusion-IO没有采用SAS控制器，直接将NAND Flash控制器与PCI总线相连。 I’m starting up my benchmarking activities again and hope to post more frequently. For instance, in the Late 2015 iMac 2TB Fusion Drive version, there’s a 128GB of Flash storage. It’s not just databases — operating systems probably aren’t ready, either. While they have a higher price tag than HDDs, you won’t have to become broke. If you look at the philosophy of the Fusion-io designs - one view you can take is that the SSD makes the host CPU work faster - because it speeds up access to the data. There is new drivers where you can turn on “reliable” mode, but I did not test it yet. Is it worth buying? Now, we will consider each of these and point out the similar and different things. For instance, if you have a few documents or folders that you open daily, they will be stored on the SSD part. I guess biggest part of that logic can be throw away and replaced by simple operation on SSD devices. Fast & Free shipping on many items! And, you know how well Apple creates the connection of SW/HW. if no budget – then he has to go with SSHD (or so called Fusion Drive). For instance, is the extra CPU consumed with FusionIO can be correlated with the extra TPM you get? If so, when will we get performance results from Vadim on SSD to determine whether that is useful? im sure random read will be the bottleneck. I am going to hold on and leave these in the lab until the SSD market matures. Let’s Wrap Up the Discussion – Fusion Drive vs SSD. Through its own driver read and write access are addressed directly on the card (ioMemory VSL, Virtual Storage Layer). Along with a high-capacity hard-drive, there will be dedicated storage space that is using SSD. The next major version of drivers will be released soon which includes improvements and features. In this article, we will do a comparison between iMac Fusion Drives vs  SSD Benchmark. "The Fusion-io PCI flash technology is a perfect complement to SanDisk's existing SSD and UltraDIMM assets," longtime industry observer and co … That way, you can save A LOT of money. It will reduce the overall write rate. When compared to HDDs, these devices offer better performance, speed, durability, and stability. Apple Fusion Drives are much affordable than SSDs. Some of them are given below. Fusion-io on Proxmox VE. I don't have a T620 or a Fusion IO card and you don't mention what OS you are using but a Google search of "installing SSD Fusion IO HP 320GB PCIe ioDrive MLC IO Accelerator" yielded this page. According to Apple’s claims, Flash Storage in iMac Late 2015 Edition is 2.5x faster than previous versions. First, the initial attempt was with Proxmox VE 3.4. All cards are offered with a PCIe 2.0 x8 interface. - from the article - strategic bifurcations in SSD market history. The transfer is quick and you do not have to bother about it. Fusion-io ioDrive vs. Intel X-25M in RAID 0 Posted on July 13, 2009 8:45 AM by Rob Williams Fusion-io is a name that popped up last year out of nowhere, and from how things are looking, their name is going to remain in the limelight for quite some time. The plan was to use OpenVZ containers/ KVM containers and compare differences and have them clustered with a second box that had both a Fusion-io ioDrive SLC card as well as a some … Fusion-io beat out plenty of companies that have been around for longer, including OCZ, Samsung and SanDisk. The Fusion card's low latency / high bandwidth has been a strong benefit over the SAN (dual 16gb/s HBAs connected to primarily SSD - for the LUNs in question anyway) in IOPS and also in latency.